In September, I attended the Halifax Conference co-sponsored by Physicians for Global Survival (PGS Canada), Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment (CAPE) and The Association of Doctors for the Advancement of Physically-active Transportation (ADAPT). These doctors are engaged in promoting non-violent conflict resolution and social justice in a sustainable world, environmental changes to support healthy people and healthy ecosystems, and reasonable responses to increasing rates of chronic disease due to physical inactivity and air pollution. There were spirited conversations on treatment of refugees, physical exercise, bicycle riding, nuclear power and nuclear war, and many other current health related issues. I especially liked the emphasis on conservation, recycling and social awareness among the participants who take seriously their part in the global crises!

I hosted a workshop on the need for physician understanding of biophysics, especially the areas of quantum gravity and electric particle gravity photon theory which is fundamental to the etiology of many cancers, Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, Motor Neuron Disease, HIV/AIDS, Bird Flu and some hospital infections such as MRSA. The use of biophysical therapies were banned from medicine some hundred years ago in the Flexner Report of 1910, because at the time it was not possible to explain the mechanisms by which photo-electric and microwave healing worked. At that time biochemistry was more advanced than was biophysics. However, with 100 years of the physicians avoiding biophysics, the pharmaceutical companies have become the main players in healing, providing medicines and vaccines for all illnesses. We seem to be reaching the limit of pharmaceuticals today as more chronic illnesses become untreatable or prohibitively expensive. Biophysics in medicine was relegated to diagnostic instruments or heat related therapies, whereas it is fundamental to the cause many diseases now called “radiosensitive” (meaning sensitive to phototherapeutic healing methodologies, including laser, or non-intensive microwave).

Electrical particle gravity photons make up the quarks, which in turn make up the protons and neutrons of the nucleus of all atoms. They also make up the quarkels which in turn make up the electrons of the atoms. These minute particles (of the order of 10-35) are in constant motion. In normal healthy matter, they move at the speed of light creating a normal electrical field energy, while in “radiosensitive” illnesses they move at less than the speed of light, creating an abnormal (or slow) electrical field energy. Viral and bacterial infections called antibiotic-resistant may well be due to the miscommunication between normal immune tissue or normal medicines with the abnormal electrical field energy of the bacteria or virus. The slower speed of electrical particle energy in the pathogen distorting the message carried by their DNA to the immune system or medicine atoms.

This is new and exciting field of healing, which can bring health to some 90 to 95% of cancer patients, and shows promise with HIV/AIDS and preventing a Bird Flu pandemic predicted to kill some 1.5 billion people. These treatments cause no side effects on normal tissue and are significantly cheaper than are pharmaceuticals.

In a keynote speech, I spoke about my research on diagnostic medical X-rays and their aging effect on adults. This measurement was a comparison between the bone marrow dose of diagnostic X-ray and one year of natural aging for increasing the risk of non-lymphatic leukemia (which increases at a rate of about 5.6% per year after age 15 years). It turned out that the 0.8 mSv exposure to diagnostic X-ray raises one’s risk of non-lymphatic leukemia by the same amount as one year of natural aging. Actually, 0.8 mSv is about equal to the terrestrial and cosmic radiation received in one year.

My conclusion was that, at this low dose of X-ray, the rate of delivery of the dose does not affect the amount of increase in risk. The nuclear physicists usually assume that the dose is only half as effective in producing cancer if the dose rate is slow, as in background radiation exposure. I also pointed out that the current practice in Epidemiology of reporting Age-Adjusted Relative Risks may mask the effect of cancer diagnosis moving to earlier ages, which is a worrisome sign of deteriorating health.

Identifying current questionable medical practices, I pointed out:

• CT scans of infants and children;
• Mammography screens of asymptomatic women;
• Spinal X-ray monitoring for juvenile scoliosis; and
• Continuous radiography during hip replacement.

Many were astonished to know that there was no scientific basis for the recommendation of mammography screening for women who had had breast cancer. In fact, the only evidence we have on this practice, from the major breast cancer study of the Health Insurance Plan of New York State, indicated that women who had breast cancer were three times as likely to have a recurrence if they entered a mammography screening program, than were those who did not enter such a program.

I am hoping to have a paper ready soon on the new findings of biophysics relevant to medical practice. The paper will be in collaboration with Robert Wood Smith, a quantum gravity expert in the U.K.

3 October 2008